Volume 4, Issue 2, December 2020, Page: 50-54
Effect of SBF on Cyclic Compression Behaviour of Porous Titanium Component for Implant Application
Munshi Muhammad Raihan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of technology, Nagaoka City, Niigata, Japan
Afrina Khan Piya, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of technology, Nagaoka City, Niigata, Japan
Mohammad Alamgir Hossain, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Received: Jun. 25, 2020;       Accepted: Aug. 24, 2020;       Published: Sep. 3, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ie.20200402.14      View  97      Downloads  40
In the recent years, porous structure is being drawn attention to the researcher for implant application for superior characteristics over bulk materials. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cyclic compression behaviour of porous titanium components in simulated body fluid (SBF). Porous titanium component developed by replica impregnation method was taken for study. Compression tests in air revealed that the yield strength of the porous body is 8MPa on average and elastic modulus is around 180MPa which is compatible to cancellous bone application. After 10% strain porous structure deformed plastically producing a long plateau region. Compressive fatigue tests revealed that at higher stress level porous titanium failed earlier in SBF than in air. In contrast, fatigue limit of porous substrate is 2 MPa which was not affected by SBF medium. After 10 million cycles in SBF, Calcium Phosphate layer was partially formed on the surface of porous titanium by re-precipitation from SBF. EDS analysis showed that the Ca/P atomic ratio was 1.44 which is near to beta TCP and HA phase and these phases are beneficial for bone tissue ingrowth.
SBF, Cyclic Compression Behaviour, Porous Titanium, Implant Application, Corrosion Resistance, EDS Analysis, Osteoconductivity, and Bioactive Coating
To cite this article
Munshi Muhammad Raihan, Afrina Khan Piya, Mohammad Alamgir Hossain, Effect of SBF on Cyclic Compression Behaviour of Porous Titanium Component for Implant Application, Industrial Engineering. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2020, pp. 50-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ie.20200402.14
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Tennison M, Caleb RS, Nicholas KS, Alison KK, Siran MK, Wael KB. (2015). Prevalence and Perioperative Outcomes of Off-Label Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2000–2010. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 30 (11): 1872-1878.
Andy FZ, Paymon R, Kevin CC. (2018). Advances in Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Biomaterials. Hand Clinics. 34 (2): 185-194.
Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. (2005). Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 26 (27): 5474-5491.
Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, Klawitter JJ, Talbert CD, Stelling FH. (1970). Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 4 (3): 433-456.
Bai F, Wang Z, Lu J, Liu J, Chen G, Lv R, Wang J, Lin K, Zhang J, Huang XGI. (2010). The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Eng. Part A. 16 (12): 3791-3803.
Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP. (2006). Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials. 27: 2651-2670.
Piya AK, Raihan MM, Hossain MA. (2020). Effect of Osteoblasts Cell Adhesion Behavior on Biomaterial Surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope. Advances in Applied Sciences. 5 (1): 1-10.
Manonukul A, Srikudvien P, Tange M. (2016). Microstructure and mechanical properties of commercially pure titanium foam with varied cell size fabricated by replica impregnation method. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 650: 432-437.
Hedayati R, Janbaz S, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA. (2017). How does tissue regeneration influence the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured porous biomaterials? Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 65: 831-841.
Hedayati R, Yavari SA, Zadpoor AA. (2017). Fatigue crack propagation in additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 76: 457-463.
de Krijger J, Rans C, Van Hooreweder B, Lietaert K, Pouran B, Zadpoor AA. (2017). Effects of stress ratio on the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous biomaterials under compressive loading. Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 70: 7-16.
Li F, Li J, Huang T, Kou H, Zhou L. (2016). Compression fatigue behavior and failure mechanism of porous titanium for biomedical applications, Materials Science and Engineering: C. 60: 485-488.
Özbilen S, Liebert D, Beck T, Bram M. (2016). Fatigue behavior of highly porous titanium produced by powder metallurgy with temporary space holders. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 60: 446-457.
Kokubo T, Takadama H. (2006). How useful is SBF in predicting in Vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 27 (15): 2907-29.
Robert BH. (2006). Thermal spraying of biomaterials. Surface and Coatings Technology. 201 (5): 2012-2019.
Windarti T, Darmawan A, Marliana A. (2019). Synthesis of β-TCP by sol-gel method: variation of Ca/P molar ratio. IOP Conf. Ser. Material Science Engineering. 509 (1): 012147.
Browse journals by subject